DON'T BELIEVE ALL YOU DON'T SEE.
Like any red blooded American Geezer, I love a good suspenseful mystery. You probably do, too. Because I was brought up on movies, like Sherlock Holmes, TV shows like Twilight Zone and books by any number of great mystery writers of the 40s and 50s. It’s one of the reasons I find it difficult to watch today’s so-called mystery films. The last one I attempted to see dealt with a ‘master criminal’ who was convicted of breaking a Toby mug. Oy vey!
Actually, The Da Vinci Code was a brilliant mystery novel which caused lots of controversy because of its subject matter. Loved the book and hated the movie. The mystery dealt with Leonardo Da Vinci’s “Last Supper” – a 15th-Century mural painting that depicts Jesus telling his apostles that one of them would betray him. The famous fresco is already the focus of mythical speculation after author Dan Brown based his book around the painting, arguing in the novel that Jesus married his follower, Mary Magdelene, and fathered a child by her. Scholars and church officials were outraged by Brown’s book and the suggestion that Jesus married anyone. One Vatican big shot accused Brown of heresy and insisted that Dan show an official wedding invitation from the nuptials...”or keep his friggin’ yap shut!”
This didn’t end the arguments. Now Slavisa Pesci (no relation to Joe) an information technologist and amateur scholar – how does one become an ‘amateur’ scholar? Do they study but just for fun? – Slavisa claims superimposing the “Last Supper” with its mirror-image throws up another picture containing a figure that looks like a Templar knight and another holding a small baby. Wow! “I came across it by accident, from one of the details you can infer that we are not talking about chance but about precise calculation,” Pesci told journalists when he unveiled his theory last week.
In the superimposed version, he says, a figure on Christ’s left appears to be cradling a baby it its arms. But made no suggestion this could be Christ’s child. It occurs to me that maybe the kid’s parent asked John the Baptist to watch the baby while he took a dump. Judas, whose imminent betrayal of Christ is the force breaking the right-hand line of the original fresco, appears in an empty space on the left in the reverse image version. And Pesci also suggests that the superimposed version shows a goblet before Christ and illustrates when Christ blessed bread and wine at a supper with his disciples for the first Eucharist. The original Da Vinci depicts Christ when he predicts that one among them will betray him.
Don’t know about you but I’m confused as hell about anything superimposed. There was only one thing for me to do – as an amateur sleuth – which means I solve crimes whenever I try to return a tic tac – I did my own experiment. I stole the original “Last Supper” fresco, held a make-up mirror up to it and…are you ready?....indeed found some weird goings on. This whole thing is obviously a con job concocted by Pesci who hasn’t been able to get good film roles lately to get some publicity.
The so-called ‘baby’ in someone’s arms turns out to be a seeded rye bread and the figure that looks like a Templar Knight is in reality some bimbo wearing a Hooters t-shirt.
It’s pretty sick for a desperate poor soul to try and spoil the beliefs of others just to get their name in the papers. The next thing someone will claim is that Da Vinci’s Last Supper is a number painting. Sherlock Holmes or Humphrey Bogart would have solved this so-called mystery before you could dip into your popcorn bag.
Actually, The Da Vinci Code was a brilliant mystery novel which caused lots of controversy because of its subject matter. Loved the book and hated the movie. The mystery dealt with Leonardo Da Vinci’s “Last Supper” – a 15th-Century mural painting that depicts Jesus telling his apostles that one of them would betray him. The famous fresco is already the focus of mythical speculation after author Dan Brown based his book around the painting, arguing in the novel that Jesus married his follower, Mary Magdelene, and fathered a child by her. Scholars and church officials were outraged by Brown’s book and the suggestion that Jesus married anyone. One Vatican big shot accused Brown of heresy and insisted that Dan show an official wedding invitation from the nuptials...”or keep his friggin’ yap shut!”
This didn’t end the arguments. Now Slavisa Pesci (no relation to Joe) an information technologist and amateur scholar – how does one become an ‘amateur’ scholar? Do they study but just for fun? – Slavisa claims superimposing the “Last Supper” with its mirror-image throws up another picture containing a figure that looks like a Templar knight and another holding a small baby. Wow! “I came across it by accident, from one of the details you can infer that we are not talking about chance but about precise calculation,” Pesci told journalists when he unveiled his theory last week.
In the superimposed version, he says, a figure on Christ’s left appears to be cradling a baby it its arms. But made no suggestion this could be Christ’s child. It occurs to me that maybe the kid’s parent asked John the Baptist to watch the baby while he took a dump. Judas, whose imminent betrayal of Christ is the force breaking the right-hand line of the original fresco, appears in an empty space on the left in the reverse image version. And Pesci also suggests that the superimposed version shows a goblet before Christ and illustrates when Christ blessed bread and wine at a supper with his disciples for the first Eucharist. The original Da Vinci depicts Christ when he predicts that one among them will betray him.
Don’t know about you but I’m confused as hell about anything superimposed. There was only one thing for me to do – as an amateur sleuth – which means I solve crimes whenever I try to return a tic tac – I did my own experiment. I stole the original “Last Supper” fresco, held a make-up mirror up to it and…are you ready?....indeed found some weird goings on. This whole thing is obviously a con job concocted by Pesci who hasn’t been able to get good film roles lately to get some publicity.
The so-called ‘baby’ in someone’s arms turns out to be a seeded rye bread and the figure that looks like a Templar Knight is in reality some bimbo wearing a Hooters t-shirt.
It’s pretty sick for a desperate poor soul to try and spoil the beliefs of others just to get their name in the papers. The next thing someone will claim is that Da Vinci’s Last Supper is a number painting. Sherlock Holmes or Humphrey Bogart would have solved this so-called mystery before you could dip into your popcorn bag.